top of page

APIL advocates for equal sensitivity in fixed costs

APIL has pressed the government to remove all fatal cases from the forthcoming fixed costs scheme for lower-value clinical negligence claims.

“Any case in which a patient has died at the hands of the NHS needs more time and greater sensitivity than is afforded by the new regime,” said Guy Forster, executive committee member of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL).

Stillbirths and newborn deaths are already excluded from the new scheme of fixed recoverable costs for claims valued at up to £25,000, which comes into effect on 1 April.

“Whilst we support the notion that cases involving baby loss need to be treated with the utmost care and sensitivity and therefore excluded from the regime, we do not understand why the same sensitivity is not extended to other tragic and avoidable deaths,” said Guy.

APIL contacted the Department of Health and Social Care (DoHSC) in October to raise the issue and followed up with a request for a meeting, but has not received a response.

“It makes no sense to us, for example, why the death of a toddler with meningitis might fall within the scope of fixed costs when a neonatal death is excluded. All bereavements must be treated with the same sensitivity and compassion,” said Guy.

“It is within the Government’s power to act now, delay the reforms, and amend the rules.”

Guy emphasises that time is running out. He highlights how there is still a severe lack of detail about how the new regime will work. For example, whether inquest costs will be recoverable. It is the ‘sensible and humane’ thing to remove all fatal cases from the scope of fixed recoverable costs.

In his conclusion, Guy explains that the government’s outdated perspective and failure to modernise the law are the only reasons fatal cases are considered ‘low-value.'”The lack of concern for bereaved families is shameful.”

14 views0 comments


bottom of page